Skip to main content
AAHPM Logo
Login
  • Join/Renew
  • Blog
  • Contact
Menu Search Account
  • Membership
    • Join/Renew
      • Member Benefits
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
    • Member Center
    • Getting Involved
    • Communities
      • SIG Instructions
      • Join a SIG
      • Member Councils
    • Mentoring
    • FAAHPM
      • Current Fellows
  • Education & Practice
    • Writing Instructional Objectives
    • Meetings
      • Annual Assembly
        • Back to Meetings
        • Assembly Home
        • About the Assembly
          • Why Attend
        • Special Events
        • Educational Sessions
          • Plenaries
        • Call 1 - Sessions, Workshops, SIG Endorsed, Educational Exchange
        • Plan Your Trip
        • CE and MOC
        • Exhibits & Advertising
        • Call for Case Submissions
        • Call for Scholar E-Poster
      • Leadership Forum: Ascend
      • New! State of the Science
      • State of the Science
        • Back to Meetings
        • Home
        • Plan Your Trip
        • Schedule and Pricing
        • Call for Abstracts
      • Board Review Course
        • Back to Meetings
        • IBRC Home
        • IBRC Evaluations
      • Pain Management Course
      • Calendar
    • Publications
      • JPSM
        • Members JPSM
      • PC-FACS
        • Members - PC-FACS
      • Quarterly
        • Members Quarterly Full Access
          • Summer 14 President's Message
          • Summer 14 Academy News
          • Summer 14 Advocacy Updates
          • summer 14 Art of Caring
          • Summer 14 Clinical Pearls
          • Summer 14 Progress Report
          • summer 14 communities
          • summer 14 Assembly
          • Fall14 Academy News
          • Fall 14 Advocacy Update
          • Fall 14 Annual Assembly
          • Fall 14 Art of Caring
          • Fall 14 Clinical Pearls
          • Fall 14 Feature
          • Fall 14 HMDCB
          • Fall 14 President
          • Fall 14 Progress
          • Winter 14 Clinical Pearls
          • Winter 14 Leaders
          • Winter 14 AAHPM News
          • Winter 14 Advocacy Update
          • Winter 14 Art of Caring
          • Winter 14 Board of Directors
          • Winter 14 Feature
          • Winter 14 HMDCB Exam
          • Winter 14 Paper Sessions
          • Winter 14 President's Message
          • Winter 14 Progress Report
          • Spring 15 President's Message
          • Spring 15 Clinical Pearls
          • Spring 15 Advocacy Update
          • Spring 15 Art of Caring
          • Spring 15 Feature
          • Spring 15 HMDCB Certification
          • Spring 15 Communities Update
          • Spring 15 Shaping the Future
          • Spring 15 AAHPM News
          • Summer 15 AAHPM News
          • Summer 14 Feature
          • Summer 15 AAHPM Summer Institute
          • Summer 15 Advocacy Update
          • Summer 15 Annual Assembly
          • Summer 15 Art of Caring
          • Summer 15 Clinical Pearls
          • Summer 15 Communities Update
          • Summer 15 Feature
          • Summer 15 HMDCB Exam
          • Summer 15 Meet Joe Rotella
          • Summer 15 President's Message
          • Summer 15 Quarterly Progress Report
          • Fall 15 Feature
          • Fall 15 AAHPM News
          • Fall 15 Annual Assembly
          • Fall 15 President's Message
          • Fall 15 Advocacy Update
          • Fall 15 Clinical Pearls
          • Fall 15 Art of Caring
          • Fall 15 Quarterly Progress Report
          • Fall 15 HMDCB Certification
          • Winter 15 AAHPM News
          • Winter 15 Advocacy Update
          • Winter 15 Annual Assembly
          • Winter 15 Art of Caring
          • Winter 15 Clinical Pearls
          • Winter 15 Feature
          • Winter 15 HMDCB Certification
          • Winter 15 President's Message
          • Spring 2016 Feature
          • Spring 2016 President's Message
          • Spring 2016 Clinical Pearls
          • Spring 2016 Art of Caring
          • Spring 2016 Ethics
          • Spring 2016 Communities Update
          • Spring 2016 Quarterly Progress Report
          • Spring 2016 AAHPM News
          • Summer 16 AAHPM News
          • Summer 16 Advocacy Update
          • Summer 16 Art of Caring
          • Summer 16 Assembly Recap
          • Summer 16 Clinical Pearls
          • Summer 16 Communities Update
          • Summer 16 Death Cafe
          • Summer 16 Feature
          • Summer 16 HMDCB Update
          • Summer 16 President's Message
          • Summer 16 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Fall 16 AAHPM News
        • Fall 16 Advocacy Update
        • Fall 16 Art of Caring
        • Fall 16 Assembly Promo
        • Fall 16 Clinical Pearls
        • Fall 16 Ethics
        • Fall 16 Feature
        • Fall 16 HMDCB Update
        • Fall 16 President's Message
        • Fall 16 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Winter 16 Advocacy Update
        • Winter 16 AAHPM News
        • Winter 16 Art of Caring
        • Winter 16 Clinical Pearls
        • Winter 16 Ethics
        • Winter 16 Feature
        • Winter 16 HMDCB Update
        • Winter 16 President's Message
        • Winter 16 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Winter 16 Assembly Paper Sessions
        • Spring 17 AAHPM News
        • Spring 17 Art of Caring
        • Spring 17 Clinical Pearls
        • Spring 17 Feature
        • Spring 17 HMDCB Update
        • Spring 17 President's Message
        • Spring 17 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Spring 17 Stay Certified
        • Summer 17 AAHPM News
        • Summer 17 Advocacy Update
        • Summer 17 Art of Caring
        • Summer 17 Clinical Pearls
        • Summer 17 Ethics
        • Summer 17 Feature
        • Summer 17 HMDCB Update
        • Summer 17 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Summer 17 President's Message
        • Summer 17 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Summer 17 Annual Assembly
        • Fall 17 President's Message
        • Fall 17 Advocacy Update
        • Fall 17 Clinical Pearls
        • Fall 17 Feature
        • Fall 17 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Fall 17 Art of Caring
        • Fall 17 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Fall 17 Annual Assembly
        • Fall 17 AAHPM News
        • Winter 17 AAHPM News
        • Winter 17 Annual Assembly
        • Winter 17 Art of Caring
        • Winter 17 Clinical Pearls
        • Winter 17 Feature
        • Winter 17 HMDCB Update
        • Winter 17 All About Essentials
        • Winter 17 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Winter 17 President's Message
        • Winter 17 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Spring 18 Clinical Pearls
        • Spring 18 Diversity & Inclusion
        • Spring 18 Feature
        • Spring 18 HMDCB Update
        • Spring 18 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Spring 18 Presidents Message
        • Spring 18 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Spring 18 AAHPM News
        • Spring 18 Art of Caring
        • Summer 18 AAHPM News
        • Summer 18 Advocacy Update
        • Summer 18 Annual Assembly
        • Summer 18 Art of Caring
        • Summer 18 Clinical Pearls
        • Summer 18 Ethics
        • Summer 18 Feature
        • Summer 18 HMDCB Update
        • Summer 18 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Summer 18 President's Message
        • Summer 18 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Fall 18 AAHPM News
        • Fall 18 Annual Assembly
        • Fall 18 Art of Caring
        • Fall 18 Clinical Pearls
        • Fall 18 Diversity & Inclusion
        • Fall 18 Feature
        • Fall 18 HMDCB Update
        • Fall 18 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Fall 18 President's Message
        • Fall 18 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Winter 18 AAHPM News
        • Winter 18 Advocacy Update
        • Winter 18 Annual Assembly
        • Winter 18 Art of Caring
        • Winter 18 Clinical Pearls
        • Winter 18 Ethics
        • Winter 18 Feature
        • Winter 18 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Winter 18 President's Message
        • Winter 18 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Winter 18 HMDCB Update
        • Spring 19 Editors Message
        • Spring 19 Meet the President
        • Spring 19 Clinical Pearls
        • Spring 19 Art of Caring
        • Spring 19 Advocacy Update
        • Spring 19 Feature
        • Spring 19 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Spring 19 Diversity and Inclusion
        • Spring 19 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Spring 19 HMDCB Update
        • Spring 19 AAHPM News
        • Summer 19 Presidents Message
        • Summer 19 Clinical Pearls
        • Summer 19 Art of Caring
        • Summer 19 Annual Assembly
        • Summer 19 Advocacy Update
        • Summer 19 Feature
        • Summer 19 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Summer 19 Ethics and the Hidden Curriculum
        • Summer 19 Research or Quality Improvement
        • Summer 19 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Summer 19 HMDCB Update
        • Summer 19 AAHPM News
        • Fall 19 Presidents Message
        • Fall 19 Clinical Pearls
        • Fall 19 Art of Caring
        • Fall 19 Annual Assembly
        • Fall 19 Advocacy Update
        • Fall 19 Feature
        • Fall 19 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Fall 19 Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion
        • Fall 19 Quality Improvement
        • Fall 19 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Fall 19 HMDCB Update
        • Fall 19 AAHPM News
        • Fall 19 State of the Science
        • Winter 19 Presidents Message
        • Winter 19 Editor's Message
        • Winter 19 Clinical Pearls
        • Winter 19 Art of Caring
        • Winter 19 Annual Assembly
        • Winter 19 Advocacy Update
        • Winter 19 Feature
        • Winter 19 Pathways to Palliative Care
        • Winter 19 Quarterly Progress Report
        • Winter 19 State of the Science
        • Winter 19 HMDCB Update
        • Winter 19 AAHPM News
      • SmartBriefs
    • Self-Study
      • Board Prep Materials
      • Essentials
      • Primer
      • HPM PASS
      • HPM FAST
        • HPM FAST CME
      • Hospice Products
        • HMD Manual
        • HMD PREP
          • HMD PREP CME
      • Opioid REMS
      • Recordings
      • hpmpasscme
      • HPMQ
      • Opioid Resources
    • Fellowships
      • Competencies
        • Pediatric Competencies
      • Accreditation
      • NRMP Match
      • Grants
        • Ho/Chiang Foundation
      • Hospice Program Toolkit
    • CME
    • Quality
      • Measuring What Matters
      • Quality Reporting
      • Quality Resources
      • Quality Registries
      • Quality Improvement Education
    • Research
      • Research Funding
      • Successful Research Grants
  • Advocacy
    • Stay Informed
    • Take Action
    • Key Issues
      • Opioids
      • Workforce
  • Career Development
    • Jobs
    • Clinical Training
      • Additional Training
    • Leadership Development
      • AAHPM Ignite
      • AAHPM Ascend
        • Leadership Forum Faculty and Facilitators
        • Ascend Schedule
        • Ascend Facilitators
      • AAHPM Elevate
    • Certification
      • Allopathic
      • Hospice
        • HMDCB Research
      • Osteopathic
    • Continuing HPM Certification
    • Workforce Statistics
    • Scholarships
      • Access Fund
      • Hearst Scholars
      • International Physicians
      • Pediatric Scholarship
      • Research Scholars
    • Resilience and Well-being
  • About
    • History
    • Position Statements
      • Access to Palliative Care and Hospice Position Statement
      • Artificial Nutrition Position Statement
      • Research Ethics Position Statement
      • Palliative Sedation Position Statement
      • Physician-Assisted Dying Position Statement
      • Withholding Position Statement
      • Physician Assisted Dying Position Statement Review
      • Physician-Assisted Dying
    • Talking About HPM
      • Advance Directives-Talking HPM
      • Choosing a Hospice Program-Talking HPM
      • Defining HPM-Talking HPM
      • Explaining PAD-Talking HPM
      • Costs-Talking HPM
      • Withdrawing LST-Talking HPM
      • Choosing Wisely
      • Members Talking About HPM
    • Governance
      • Board of Directors
        • Board Only
        • Past Presidents
      • Committees
      • Staff
        • Staff
      • Revised Bylaws
    • Donate
      • AAHPM Giving Circle
    • Awards
      • Visionaries in HPM
      • Emerging Leaders
    • Social Media
  • Store
    • Browse All
    • Books
    • E-Learning
    • Recordings
    • Essentials
  • My Account
  • Username & Password
  • Manage Credit Cards
  • Demographics
  • My Classroom
  • Quarterly Newsletter
  • Pay Open Balances
  • Purchase History
  • Membership Details
  • My Communities
  • My Volunteer History
  • Uploaded Documents
  • Writing Instructional Objectives
  • Meetings
    • Annual Assembly
    • Leadership Forum: Ascend
    • New! State of the Science
    • State of the Science
    • Board Review Course
    • Pain Management Course
    • Calendar
  • Publications
    • JPSM
    • PC-FACS
    • Quarterly
    • SmartBriefs
  • Self-Study
    • Board Prep Materials
    • Essentials
    • Primer
    • HPM PASS
    • HPM FAST
    • Hospice Products
    • Opioid REMS
    • Recordings
    • hpmpasscme
    • HPMQ
    • Opioid Resources
  • Fellowships
    • Competencies
    • Accreditation
    • NRMP Match
    • Grants
    • Hospice Program Toolkit
  • CME
  • Quality
    • Measuring What Matters
    • Quality Reporting
    • Quality Resources
    • Quality Registries
    • Quality Improvement Education
  • Research
    • Research Funding
    • Successful Research Grants

Feature

Feature1

Jacqueline M. Kocinski, MPP

First there was the SGR. Now it’s MACRA, MIPS, and APMs. It’s a dizzying alphabet soup you wish you could ignore…except, if you’re reading this, you likely can’t, as it may well impact how you will be paid under Medicare.

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA) of 2015 repealed the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR)—the formula that was used for nearly 2 decades to determine Medicare payment for clinician services—and established instead a new framework for rewarding value over volume in the fee-for-service Medicare program. The Quality Payment Program (QPP) was created to execute this transformation, streamlining previous quality reporting programs into one new system—the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS)—and incentivizing participation in qualifying Alternative Payment Models (APMs).

Although APMs are one of two primary pathways to QPP participation, they provide the largest payment incentives for participation and performance. APM participation requires providers not only to deliver higher-quality care, but also to assume responsibility for controlling or reducing cost. Abundant data exist to demonstrate that palliative care drives both higher quality and lower cost for seriously ill patients, creating key opportunities for hospice and palliative care providers to potentially thrive in APMs, including through Physician-Focused Payment Models (PFPMs). These APMs, for which Medicare is the payer, include physician group practices or individual physicians as APM Entities and target the quality and costs of physician services.

Envisioning Better Care

Recognizing the opportunities and challenges for Academy members as fundamental changes in care payment and delivery take shape, AAHPM convened an APM Task Force in fall 2016 to develop a strategy to support members in engaging and succeeding in APMs. The overarching aim was to ensure sustainability of high-quality palliative care and hospice services that improve quality of care and quality of life for patients with serious illness and their caregivers. Phil Rodgers, MD FAAHPM, a leading national expert in palliative care payment and delivery innovation and past chair of AAHPM’s Public Policy Committee and Emerging Payment and Delivery Models Workgroup, was appointed to lead the task force. Fifteen additional Academy members were invited to serve based on their recognized leadership in key aspects of APM development, including quality measurement and improvement, delivery innovation, novel collaboration and partnerships, and community engagement. These Academy thought leaders include representatives of palliative care provider organizations; hospices; health systems; and payers serving urban, suburban, and rural communities.

“The task force approached its work with the mindset that better payment is really about better care for patients and families,” Rodgers said. “In the current model, there’s no way to pay for what people want and value,” added APM Task Force member Dana Lustbader, MD FCCM FCCP FAHPM.

The central problem the task force addressed was that many patients who have serious illnesses are not well-served by the current fragmented, intervention-oriented healthcare system. “Although high-quality, interdisciplinary palliative care services provide significant benefits for patients, caregivers, and payers, the current fee-for-service payment system does not adequately reimburse community-based, interdisciplinary palliative care services and thus does not enable palliative care teams to deliver those services to the right patient, in the right place, at the right time,” Rodgers explained.

The task force first met for an all-day brainstorming session in November 2016 to begin developing a payment model that would support the delivery of palliative care services to patients in all stages of serious illness who are not yet eligible for or willing to enroll in hospice care. Harold D. Miller, president and CEO of the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform, was contracted to facilitate the session and draft an initial model based on the goals and specifications set forth by the group. Key questions the group considered included

  • Which providers should be eligible?
  • Which patients should be eligible?
  • How big should payments be to support adequate care?
  • Should payment amounts differ for patients with differing levels of need and risk?
  • Will savings be sufficient to offset the cost of higher payments and avoid increasing total spending?
  • For what aspects of spending should the palliative care team be accountable?
  • How do patients and payers know the palliative care team is delivering high-quality care?
  • How does the palliative care team APM relate to accountable care organizations and other APMs?

The task force worked over several months to address these key questions and, ultimately, produced two payment reform proposals designed to enable patients with serious illness to receive palliative care across a wide range of healthcare settings in urban, suburban, rural, and underserved communities.

Under the first model, Palliative Care Support to a Medical Home (PCS), payments are designed to allow palliative care teams to provide support to accountable entities—such as a Medical Home, Oncology Care Model practice, Comprehensive Primary Care Plus practice, or even Medicare Advantage plan—in addressing unmet needs of patients with serious illness who are assigned or attributed to those providers.

The PCS model includes one-time payments to provide comprehensive assessment and care planning services and monthly payments to allow for comanagement of patients with ongoing needs. Both payments would be tiered based on a patient’s health and functional status so as to align with the intensity of interdisciplinary services required. PCS services would be subject to quality measurement, but PCS payments would not qualify as an “advanced APM” under MACRA because they do not require palliative care teams alone to assume “more than nominal” financial risk. Rather, they are designed to assist other quality- and cost-accountable providers in the care of their patients with serious illness.

A second model, titled Patient and Caregiver Support for Serious Illness (PACSSI), was crafted to qualify as a MACRA APM by allowing palliative care teams themselves to become accountable for the quality and cost of the care they provide. Monthly PACSSI payments would support interdisciplinary palliative care teams and be tiered similarly to PCS. In addition, payments would be adjusted up or down based on performance on both quality and cost measures related to the services delivered. There also would be an option under PACSSI for palliative care teams to receive bundled payments, which would require greater accountability for service delivery and total cost of care.

Rodgers and Miller presented a draft of the task force proposals to attendees at the 2017 Annual Assembly of Hospice and Palliative Care. A detailed discussion draft was subsequently posted for review by Academy members, who were invited to provide feedback through an online survey. More than 100 members responded with input on priorities, design parameters, expected participation, and more. AAHPM also reached out to nearly 20 external organizations to solicit input. These include hospice and palliative care stakeholders, such as national associations representing other disciplines or entities involved in providing palliative care (nurses, social workers, physician assistants, chaplains, pharmacists, hospice organizations), and other medical specialty societies (geriatrics, home care medicine, post-acute and long-term care, clinical oncology). Payers and palliative care researchers also were consulted. Finally, Academy leaders met with staff of the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) to discuss AAHPM’s draft payment reform proposals.

Because PCS would not quality as an APM under MACRA, CMMI staff indicated it might be confusing to advance it for consideration by the Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee (PTAC), the body established under the law to review proposed models and make recommendations to the Secretary of Health & Human Services for testing and implementation of APMs. The task force therefore decided that AAHPM’s PTAC submission would focus solely on PACSSI, and committed to pursue other strategies to advance the goals of PCS, including submitting new payment code proposals for consideration by the American Medical Association’s Current Procedural Terminology Editorial Panel.

Advancing a New Payment Model

In August 2017, AAHPM submitted to the PTAC a proposal for the PACSSI payment model. The final proposal reflects substantial changes compared to the discussion draft circulated four months prior. “These revisions were based on iterative and wide-ranging feedback AAHPM solicited from numerous stakeholders representing hospice and palliative medicine practices of many sizes and types, interdisciplinary leaders, payers, and noted researchers in the field, as well as CMMI,” Rodgers noted.

The PACSSI model is designed to provide patients and caregivers in all types of communities with access to high-quality palliative care from many types of palliative care teams working through “APM Entities” willing to be accountable for both quality and cost of care. These APM Entities could include PCTs working as independent provider organizations or associated with hospices, home health organizations, hospitals, businesses focused on palliative care delivery, or integrated health systems through direct employment or contracting. In addition to physicians and other clinicians eligible to bill Medicare, PCTs also will include clinicians not reimbursed under the Medicare program (eg, nurses, pharmacists, social workers, or spiritual care professionals) who work in conjunction with patients’ other care providers and provide psychosocial and spiritual support. “Seriously ill patients and their caregivers more often need a social worker or nurse and not a billing provider,” Lustbader explained.

PACSSI-participating PCTs would be required to demonstrate the capability to perform assessments and deliver services through an interdisciplinary team structured in accordance with the essential elements of the National Consensus Project (NCP) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care as well as to respond appropriately on a 24/7 basis to patient and caregiver requests for advice and assistance in managing issues associated with the patient’s health conditions and functional limitations. This includes the ability to provide face-to-face services in all care settings when needed (either in person or through videoconference services) as well as telephonic responses.

“Many different services are being offered now under the guise of palliative care, advanced illness management, and care coordination. We need to be sure that people living with serious illness know what they are getting and that the care can deliver on its promise,” said AAHPM Chief Medical Officer Joe Rotella, MD MBA HMDC FAAHPM. “In that respect, it has been most helpful to have the NCP Guidelines as a guidepost to define what services the palliative care team must deliver.”

Under the PACSSI model, interdisciplinary PCTs could participate in one of two tracks that would have increasing levels of accountability and risk. In both tracks, PCTs would receive tiered monthly payments to support interdisciplinary community-based palliative care delivered to patients who meet eligibility criteria that include a diagnosis of a serious illness or multiple chronic conditions, functional limitations, and a pattern of healthcare utilization. These payments would replace fee-for-services payments for evaluation and management (E/M), chronic care management, and advance care planning services to provide financial support and flexibility for PCTs to manage patients’ care. PCTs would work in collaboration with the full spectrum of primary and specialty care clinicians to develop and execute a care plan consistent with patients’ needs and preferences.

Under Track 1, PCTs would be subject to positive and negative payment incentives of up to 4% of total PACSSI care management fees received for a year, based on their performance on quality and spending. Under Track 2, PCTs would become responsible for not only quality but also total cost of care, sharing either in savings or losses for the patients enrolled. Quality performance in PACSSI would assess PCTs across three categories of metrics: patient-reported outcomes regarding the experience of palliative care, completion of care processes that are proven to drive quality, and utilization of healthcare services that are generally desirable or undesirable for patients at the end of life. Because several of the proposed measures are new measures that require additional testing and do not currently have sufficient evidence to establish benchmarks, PACSSI phases in accountability for performance on this subset of measures over time. When fully phased in, PCTs’ accountability for quality performance would be based on a composite score that equally weights performance across each of the three quality categories.

“When designing accountability for quality in this model, the Academy’s intention was to strike a balance between acknowledging the significant gaps in where the development and implementation of palliative care quality measures is now and driving toward where we expect to be in a few years,” Rotella said. “If we were to use only established measures exactly as they are currently specified, we would be limited mostly to process measures for narrowly defined subgroups of the seriously ill population, for example, only those with advanced cancer, receiving specialty palliative care consultation in a hospital or enrolled in hospice. On the other hand, if we were to leapfrog to our desired future and outpace quality development in our field, we would risk ineffective measures, unintended consequences, and excessive burdens on participating providers.”

“The payment incentives in PACSSI are well structured to drive improvements in both quality and cost performance,” Rodgers added. “There’s an option for smaller or less risk-ready practices to participate and grow in Track 1, where PACSSI payments are adjusted based on quality and spending performance. Track 2 will provide larger, more risk-experienced programs the opportunity to drive greater shared savings while also being accountable for quality.” Rodgers noted that the phased-in approach to pay-for performance will also allow critical time and resources for palliative care teams to strengthen necessary clinical and reporting infrastructure.

Feature table

Looking Ahead

A PTAC review team assigned to the PACSSI model has already provided AAHPM with an initial list of questions as part of its examination of the Academy’s proposal. The reviewers may engage AAHPM leaders in multiple rounds of dialogue before making a preliminary recommendation to the full committee. A public hearing will then be held during which the PTAC will vote on whether to recommend PACSSI for testing.

“The Academy’s open and inclusive development process helped to yield a diverse and impactful demonstration of support for the PACSSI model such that AAHPM was able to include letters of support from 20 organizations as part of its PTAC submission,” Rodgers said. Additional letters of support were received by PTAC during a public comment period. Many of the supporting organizations indicated they would look forward to participating in PACSSI, should it be recommended for testing by PTAC and implemented by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or that they would encourage their members to do so.

APM Task Force member Todd R. Coté, MD HMDC FAAFP FAAHPM, believes PACSSI will offer opportunities for hospices to work more closely with nonhospice palliative services to offer a true continuity of care. “As chief medical officer of a large hospice organization, I appreciate how access to nonhospice palliative services can increase the timeliness to hospice referral. Hospices still struggle with patients coming to hospice services far too late in the last few days of life. PACSSI not only includes important quality metrics that encourage the appropriate referral to and use of hospice, but I feel PACSSI will allow us to expand and increase our nonhospice palliative services in all our communities, especially throughout the rural Appalachian areas we serve.”

Lustbader already oversees a home-based palliative care program that has seen impressive results: “PACSSI would allow us to expand ProHEALTH’s current program and provide services that matter to patients and families, services that are not reimbursable in a fee-for-service environment but would be covered in the PACCSI APM.”

Going forward, Rodgers expects there will be opportunities to continue to refine the Academy’s payment reform proposals and looks forward to further engagement by members and stakeholders to assist the Academy in its efforts: “We have before us a unique and unprecedented opportunity to help shape fundamental changes in care payment and delivery for our patients and the field.”

Jackie Kocinski is AAHPM’s director of health policy and government relations. For more information about the Academy’s APM project, e-mail This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .


AAHPM APM Task Force Goals:

  • Ensure access to high-quality, interdisciplinary palliative care for patients and caregivers throughout their journey with serious illness (all stages of illness and care needs).
  • Create a new payment model for palliative care teams managing patients with serious illness that could qualify as an APM under MACRA.
  • Determine how palliative care teams can add value to providers working in other APMs and accountable models (including commercial health plans).
  • Provide flexibility in our models to maximize participation by a broad diversity of interdisciplinary palliative care teams, serving patients and caregivers in all settings and all geographies.

Go to the table of contents to read more articles.

Essential Practices in Hospice and Palliative Medicine

This newly updated and rebranded comprehensive self-study provides a critical foundation for those who want to incorporate principles of hospice and palliative medicine into their daily lives.

Learn More

Quick Links

  • Job Mart
  • JPSM
  • CME/CE Certificates
  • Purchased Downloads
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

For Exhibitors and Advertisers

  • Commercial Support
  • Exhibiting and Advertising
  • Mailing Labels

For Students and Residents

  • Membership
  • Careers
  • Fellowships
  • Publications
Facebook Twitter Linked In Visit our patient website: PalliativeDoctors.org

AAHPM Logo

8735 West Higgins Road, Suite 300 Chicago, IL 60631

Phone 847-375-4712 Fax 847-375-6475 E-mail info@aahpm.org

Copyright © American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine