Fall Call for Abstract Reviewers
Contribute Your Expertise
The Annual Assembly of Hospice and Palliative Care relies on peer reviewers to help identify high-quality, relevant, and evidence-informed educational content. By serving as a reviewer, you play an important role in shaping the educational program and advancing the field of hospice and palliative care.
AAHPM and HPNA welcome reviewers from across the interdisciplinary hospice and palliative care team.
Key Dates and Timeline
Application Period
- Opens: Tuesday, September 8
- Closes: Tuesday, September 22 at 11:59pm PT
Abstract Review Period
- Opens: Monday, October 5, 2026
- Closes: Monday, October 26 at 11:59pm PT
Before applying, please ensure you are available during the review period. Reviewers should expect to spend up to four hours reviewing assigned abstracts.
Previously Applied Summer Reviewers
If you applied to be a reviewer during the Summer Call and indicated interest in reviewing for the Fall Call, you do not need to submit another application. The Annual Assembly team will contact you directly to confirm your availability and continued interest.
Reviewer Opportunities
Reviewers will evaluate abstracts submitted for:
- Late-Breaking Research
- Early Career & Professionals in Training
- RAPiD Posters
Because of the specialized nature of scientific research abstracts, applicants interested in reviewing Late-Breaking Research or RAPiD Poster submissions should have a research background.
All reviews are conducted using a double-blind review process, ensuring reviewer and author identities and institutions remain confidential throughout evaluation and selection.
To serve as a reviewer, applicants must:
- Have professional experience in hospice and/or palliative care
- Submit a current curriculum vitae (CV) to verify relevant expertise
- Be available during the review period
AAHPM or HPNA membership is not required.
As an abstract reviewer, you will:
- Review a minimum of three abstracts
- Complete reviews during the designated review period
- Evaluate submissions using a standardized scoring rubric
- Provide objective scores and constructive feedback
- Support a fair, rigorous, and consistent selection process
Review criteria include factors such as clarity, relevance, innovation, rigor, and applicability to hospice and palliative care practice.